One reason the use
of Meth has infiltrated all parts of the country and all segments of
society is the ease of its production. Unlike most other illicit drugs,
Meth can be made in crude labs that fit inside a cooler or mass-produced
in huge facilities known as ‘super labs’. There are a number of methods
used in the United States to cook Meth for individual use or for sale.
Each one poses risks for the cooks and anyone who may come in contact with
the area – family members, first responders or the general public.
NAZI OR BIRCH
This method is named because of its WWII German inventors. It is also
called the Birch Method from the chemical reaction name (Birch-Bekenser
Reduction) or the Dissolving Metal Reduction method. The Nazi method of
production became popular during the mid- to late-1990s. It combines
ephedrine/pseudoephedrine, an active metal - usually sodium or lithium -
and anhydrous ammonia to produce Meth. This has been the most popular
method in South Dakota and other Midwestern states due the readily
available liquid fertilizer (anhydrous ammonia) found in farming areas.
The wastes produced by this method are flammable solvents and sludge,
corrosive wastes, and the reactive metals lithium and sodium that increase
the danger of explosion.
RED P
A Red P lab blew during the cooking process
and splashed this man -
leaving some burns and
a
number of chemical stains on his face
Another common Meth recipe uses the red phosphorus or Red P method. Red
phosphorus, found in safety matches, flares, smoke bombs, and the like, is
combined with iodine to make hydriodic acid (HI); that, in turn, is used
to reduce the precursor (ephedrine or pseudoephedrine) to Meth. This
method uses other hazardous chemicals such as muratic acid, lye, and a
variety of solvents, most of which are very flammable. Wastes left behind
from this cook include the flammable solvents and
.sludge,
corrosive acids and bases,
in addition to reactive yellow or white phosphorus. This method also has
the potential to produce very toxic phosphine gas if certain solvents are
heated with open flames.
Meth Cooks Killed by
Phosphine Gas
P-2-P
This method, named from the precursor used (phenyl-2-propanone) is
sometimes called the amalgam or mercuric chloride method. This recipe for
cooking Meth is much less common today than the other two methods, mainly
because the precursor is now strictly regulated. It also produces a less
potent form of Meth that contains more contaminates – leading to worse
side effects. Hazards associated with this method are extreme
flammability, corrosively, and toxicity. Cooking with this method will
leave behind toxic mercury and lead contamination among the other wastes.
ONE-POT
Also
known as the “Shake and Bake” method, this recipe produces low quantities
and low quality
Meth
and is usually made for personal use. The one-pot method involves mixing
pseudoephedrine and other necessary chemicals in one container, often a
plastic two-liter soda bottle. This method is every bit as dangerous as
the other, better-known methods. There is a high possibility of explosion
or fire from volatile precursor materials combined in one container, and
once the Meth is extracted, the cook often disposes of the waste materials
by flushing them down the toilet or dumping them along the roadsides or
fields.
Example of One-Pot cook
From
Louisville Metro Police Dept. website
A HazMat crew
member holds up a bottle
of saved urine found in a clan lab
URINE EXTRACTION
LABS
As
bizarre or disgusting as it seems, there are people who try to extract
Meth from urine – their own or from other users. These so called ‘pee
labs’ are not new; neither are they very effective. The collection process
alone takes days to weeks, and because Meth has a half-life of about
12-hours in a person’s body, users would need to collect urine all day to
recapture just a fraction of a dose of what they took earlier. But some
users think the urine-collection method is safer than the common cooking
techniques for Meth manufacturing. Law enforcement in South Dakota as
well as in other states find jars and bottles of urine in Meth labs and in
users’ homes. While
urine-labs
may sound less harmful (if more nauseating) than other methods, there are
specific dangers associated with them for both the users and those who may
raid the lab. The extraction of the drug from urine adds more risks to
the others Meth users face. As part of the normal biological pattern,
anything ingested (including Meth and other drugs) travels through a
person’s system to the liver and on to the kidneys. The kidneys
concentrate all the water-soluble materials and waste
products in the urine for excretion. When a person collects urine to try
to extract Meth from it, he also is saving proteins, salts, minerals,
caffeine and bacteria. Some diseases are also concentrated and passed
through urine. There is no exact determination of how much of these
products are extracted from urine along with Meth – but whatever is passed
on will enter the user’s system in a concentrated form the ‘second time
around’. The process of extracting Meth from urine involves a step of
creating an organic solvent that is flammable
and toxic. From
that point, the process includes creating a chemical reaction to ‘salt’
out the Meth that can be explosive.
A jar of urine found in a home freezer
Sources include:
Drug Enforcement Agency,
National Drug Intelligence Center,
Forensic Magazine and the
Partnership for a Drug Free America |
Types of Labs Contamination Cleaning Methods Remediation Cos. SD Recommendations EPA Guidelines
|